Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 15:06
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
I can't stop thinking about this plotline in 'Materialists' - NPR
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
3 Economic Events That Could Affect Your Portfolio This Week, June 16-20, 2025 - TipRanks
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Just in the last 5 years:
How can we become the best humans? How can we trust each other?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What is your best and worst childhood memory? What was your biggest fear as a child?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
‘Cheers’ star George Wendt’s cause of death confirmed - New York Daily News
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Craig admits to 'illegal move' in controversial 'no contest' - BBC